Published: Thu, June 14, 2018
Tech | By Constance Martin

Net neutrality rules are repealed. Here's what could happen next

Net neutrality rules are repealed. Here's what could happen next

But like many ardent net neutrality supporters, Schaub said he thinks it will take a while for the repeal to trickle down to customers, saying it will be more like "small and creeping changes rather than sudden shifts".

Groups taking the FCC's side in the case include CTIA, representing mobile providers AT&T, Verizon, Sprint Corp. and T-Mobile US Inc.; and NCTA - The Internet & Television Association, representing cable carriers such as Comcast Corp. and Charter Communications Inc.

In other words, certain providers could block or slow down sites like Facebook or your favorite news website.

Yet, some fear it's also possible internet providers will one day effectively charge customers more to access services like Netflix that are now included as part of your monthly bill.

What's more, internet advocates have always been concerned that if broadband providers are able to create so-called fast lanes to particular sites and services, they will in effect slow down traffic to all other locations on the internet.

"We're all going to wake up on Monday, and we're all going to be able to stream cool shows off Netflix or Hulu or YouTube", pledged Jonathan Spalter, the leader of USTelecom, a trade group for the telecom industry.

Net neutrality is officially a thing of the past - but not in Washington state.

The battle isn't entirely over, though. The repeal of net neutrality is also good for consumers, says Pai, because it puts authority over ISPs back into the hands of the FTC.

Why Richmond voters can only choose Republicans this primary election
It's an incredibly confusing primary with six Democrats competing for the chance to run against the Republican incumbent. Barbara Comstock in northern Virginia's 10th District will face the victor of a six-way Democratic primary.

The general uncertainty around the future of net neutrality is likely to extend through much of this year, according to those pushing for legislation and litigation, if not longer.

Most now have service terms that specify they won't give preferential treatment to certain websites and services, including their own.

The measure in the House seeks to reinstate the 2015 rules.

No Throttling: broadband providers may not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices.

Millions of US broadband customers have started facing the latest internet experience from Monday because Internet Service Providers (ISPs) have new powers to block, throttle or offer paid fast lanes for content companies under the new law.

For example, say you're an AT&T customer. The bill, passed with broad bipartisan support in February and signed by Gov. Jay Inslee in March, had a provision to kick into effect the moment the FCC finalized its order to eliminate the requirement for neutral Internet service, which occurred today. "This gives free reign to broadband providers to block or throttle your broadband service as long as they inform you of it".

Tech companies such as Netflix, Spotify and Snap echoed similar concerns in regulatory filings. VTel wrote to say that "regulating broadband like legacy telephone service would not create any incentives for VTel to invest in its network". For instance, they might charge more to view high-resolution "4K" video, while offering lower-quality video for free. It would also increase costs for consumers, as content providers were forced to pass along fees. Almost two dozen states and several companies have sued the government to try and preserve the rules. Oregon, Vermont and Washington state have adopted open-Internet laws, while governors in an additional six states have sought to address the matter through executive orders. He once said they were based on "hypothetical harms and hysterical prophecies of doom".

Like this: